Чего попросила FTC у MC:
RFP 1 requests materials sent to ??? (looks like ABK, talks about dates like Dec 08, the date MSFT board first approved of the merger)
RFP 3 requests documents related to cross-play
RFP 6 requests documents related to { }, the code name for Microsoft’s next generation gaming ecosystem. { } is part of Microsoft’s forward-looking strategy for its console, subscription, and cloud gaming businesses
RFP 11 requests all documents related to exclusivity of content Microsoft acquired from ZeniMax and exclusivity of content Microsoft proposes to acquire from Activision.
RFP 16 requests all documents related to making Activision content available on competing products and services after the Proposed Transaction closes.

Чего попросила FTC у AB:
RFP 1 requests documents related to gaming consumer preferences, factors affecting consumer purchase decisions, and consumer willingness to switch from one gaming console to another.
RFP 2 requests documents related to the relevance of cross-play,
RFPs 5 and 7 respectively request documents related to offering Activision on subscription services and cloud gaming services, including services from Nvidia (GeForce NOW), Nintendo (Nintendo Switch Online or NSO), Google (Stadia), and Amazon (Luna) and request documents related to offering Activision games on Nintendo devices.
RFP 8 requests documents relating to purported cannibalization of purchased games (“buy-to-play”) by subscription services and whether consumer behavior differs between buy-to- play users and subscription service users.

TL;DR: Продолжение скучной клоунады.
Они сами прекрасно понимают, что по многим пунктам, типа:
code name for Microsoft’s next generation gaming ecosystemих можно посылать по любому адресу прямым текстом.
Более того, это в принципе не проверяемо, это внутренняя деятельность компании. Если MC заявит, что нет у них пока никакого некстгена и имени для него (а если был предыдущий, то его отменили), то с этим можно будет только согласиться.